Info Center

TSL Roster Card (PDF format; to read it, you'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader.)

Miami Weather

Official FedEx Orange Bowl Home Page

Dolphin Stadium Seating Chart

2007 VT Roster

Kansas Links Official Site Rivals Site Rivals Message Board Scout Site Scout Message Board Lawrence Journal-World Journal-World Msg Bd Kansas City Star USA Today

HokieSports.com Links

Game Notes (PDF)

Radio Stations

Live Stats (home games)

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008, 8:00

TV: FOX

Forecast (from WeatherBug.com):
Click the "Miami Weather" link to the right.
Game day forecast, as of 3:00 pm Monday: Windy, partly sunny, high in the mid-60s.

Click here for TechSideline.com's VT/Kansas roster card

Game Preview: #3 Virginia Tech (11-2, 7-1 ACC) vs. #8 Kansas (11-1, 7-1)
by Chris Coleman, TechSideline.com

Frank Beamer and Virginia Tech will look to pick up their first BCS bowl win since 1995 when they take on the Kansas Jayhawks in the Orange Bowl this Thursday. The Hokies have a chance to win 12 games for the first time in school history, and they can also finish very high in the final polls. But to do that, they have to knock off Kansas, who has been beaten just once this year.

I'll be the first to admit that I don't know a lot about Kansas. The only exposure I have of them is what I've seen on ESPN highlights, and watching about half of their game against Missouri. But I do know that to win 11 games these days in college football, you have to be good.

Their offense is a spread offense that is very balanced between the run and pass. Their defense features two All-Americans, including a Unanimous All-American and the Big 12 Defensive Lineman of the Year. They have guys who can make plays all over the field.

I know some people are expecting the Hokies to get by Kansas with relative ease, but I'm expecting a 12-round fight.

The Kansas offense put up big numbers this year. They are a very balanced offense, with two running backs who are very effective, as well as a number of very good targets in the passing game. Here is a look at their season stats.

The Kansas offense runs through quarterback Todd Reesing (5-10, 200, So.). Reesing doesn't have ideal height for a quarterback, but there's no arguing with his production this year. He has completed 62.6% of his passes for 3,259 yards, with 32 touchdowns and just six interceptions.

Reesing is accurate, and Kansas will roll him out quite a bit to get him a better passing window. He is a very good thrower from outside the pocket. Expect Virginia Tech's defensive ends to take outside rushing lanes and play contain against Reesing, similar to what they did in the ACC Championship Game against Matt Ryan.

Reesing has a number of very good targets, and as a group they have excellent size. Dexton Fields (5-11, 205, r-Junior) is the shortest of the group, but he is the leading receiver. He caught 56 passes for 733 yards on the season, including six touchdown grabs.

Fields is joined on the outside by Marcus Henry (6-4, 210, Sr.). Henry is a big target, and he's also been the best big-play threat for Kansas this year. He has 52 catches for 994 yards, a whopping 19.1 yards per catch. He also caught nine touchdown passes on his way to earning Second Team All-Big 12 honors.

True freshman Dezmon Briscoe (6-3, 200, Fr.) was also a big part of the Kansas offense this year. He caught 41 passes for 471 yards and seven touchdowns. Kansas also uses Kerry Meier (6-2, 220, r-So.) at wide receiver. Meier is Todd Reesing's backup at quarterback, so the Tech defense needs to be on the lookout for trick plays.

Reesing also uses the tight end a lot. Derek Fine (6-3, 250, r-Sr.) is the team's third leading receiver. He caught 44 passes for 380 yards and four touchdowns on the season.

Kansas also fields an impressive group of running backs. Brandon McAnderson (5-10, 235, r-Sr.) is a bruiser. In fact, he's a former Second Team All-Big 12 fullback. As the starting tailback for the Jayhawks this year, McAnderson ran 1,050 yards and 16 touchdowns. He averaged a very impressive six yards per carry.

McAnderson shares time in the backfield with Jake Sharp (5-10, 190, So.). Sharp is the smaller, quicker back who should thrive in the spread offense as the primary back next season. In 2007, he ran for 788 yards on 138 carries, an average of 5.7 yards per carry. He scored seven touchdowns on the ground. McAnderson and Sharp are good receivers as well, combining for 37 catches on the season.

The success of Kansas on offense would not be possible without the play of an outstanding offensive line. Their line is led by First Team All-Big 12 tackle Anthony Collins (6-5, 310, r-Jr.). He is a dominant player. Collins was one of three finalists for the Outland Trophy and a First Team All-American.

Collins ended the regular season while playing through a very bad ankle injury. He was nowhere near 100%, and his injury is a key reason why the Jayhawks had trouble with Missouri's front four in their regular season finale. Kansas was not healthy for that game, especially with arguably their best player severely limited.

Right tackle Cesar Rodriguez (6-7, 290, Sr.) is also a good player. The tackles are the strength of the Jayhawks's offensive line. Guards Adrian Mayes (6-3, 305, Jr.) and Chet Hartley (6-4, 310, Jr.) and center Ryan Cantrell (6-3, 290, Jr.) are less experienced players. They are solid as a group, but they will probably struggle some against Virginia Tech's defensive tackles.

I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't point out that Kansas didn't face much defensive competition this year.

The Kansas offense is very good, but they were helped by the fact that they played some awful defenses this year. Six opposing defenses ranked 101 or worse in total defense? Only one opposing defense in the top 60 nationally? Ouch. Virginia Tech's defense is going to be -- by far -- the fastest and most physical the Jayhawks have faced this season.

Two of the better defenses Kansas played this year came against Colorado and Texas A&M. The Jayhawks managed just 19 points against each of those two teams.

That brings us to the Kansas defense. The Jayhawks beat Colorado and Texas A&M because of good defensive play, holding Colorado to 14 points and A&M to 11 points. I can make a legit argument that the Kansas defense is better than the Kansas offense.

Statistically, the defense isn't quite as good as its offensive counterpart. However, they faced much better competition throughout the season.

Considering whom they've played, Kansas has held up pretty well statistically. Also, ignore their rank of #57 in pass defense. A lot of teams have fallen behind the Jayhawks and were forced to throw the ball a lot. Kansas gave up a good chunk of yards through the air, but their pass efficiency defense is very high at #8 nationally. That's the best indicator of how good a pass defense really is.

You've probably heard a lot about a great cornerback who plays for Kansas, but let's start up front on the defensive line. The Jayhawks feature defensive tackle James McClinton (6-1, 285, Sr.), who is a Second Team AP All-American. He was also named the Big 12 Defensive Lineman of the Year.

McClinton is a short, stocky player with a low center of gravity. Very quick, he makes a lot of plays at or behind the line of scrimmage. He has 10.5 tackles for loss on the year. The other defensive tackle is Caleb Blakesley (6-5, 290, So.). He doesn't stand out statistically, finishing the season with just two tackles for loss and one sack, but he does start on a defensive line that finished sixth nationally against the run.

John Larson (6-3, 250, Jr.) is the top playmaker at defensive end. He finished the season with 11 tackles for loss. However, Kansas has no great pass rushers. They had just 21 sacks this year as a team. Backup defensive end Jake Laptad (6-4, 223, Fr.) is probably the best pass rusher, but he is small and only a true freshman. From a pass protection standpoint, this is the best matchup the Tech offensive line has had in quite sometime.

Kansas has three good junior linebackers, anchored by middle linebacker Joe Mortensen (6-1, 235, Jr.). Mortensen is a First Team All-Big 12 defender. He led the Jayhawks with 98 tackles on the season, including 14 tackles for loss. He is a tough, hard-nosed player. He combines with defensive tackle James McClinton to make a very good inside duo against the run.

Outside linebacker James Holt (6-3, 220, Jr.) also had a good season. He finished with 91 tackles, including 12 tackles for loss. The other linebacker is Mike Rivera (6-3, 255, Jr.). Rivera had 84 tackles and 9.5 tackles for loss. Collectively, the linebacker trio of Mortensen, Holt and Rivera play in the backfield more than any other group of linebackers Virginia Tech has seen this season.

In the secondary, cornerback Aqib Talib (6-2, 205, Jr.) is one of the top football players in the nation, regardless of position. He was one of just eight players to earn Unanimous All-American honors. If he played for a team with a bigger name than Kansas, there's no telling how much attention he would be getting.

Talib has four interceptions on the year, one of which he returned 100 yards for a touchdown. He's also broken up 13 passes. He has 12 career interceptions, and he led the nation in passes defended in 2006.

Talib is such a good athlete that he's also played some wide receiver this year, catching eight passes for 182 yards and four touchdowns. He can also be used as a kick and punt returner, although he hasn't been used in that capacity this season.

This could be the last time Talib plays for Kansas. He could elect to enter the NFL Draft in April. I would expect Kansas to use him to his maximum potential in what could be his last game. I'll be looking for him obviously on defense, but also on offense and special teams.

Kansas rotates a lot at the other secondary positions. At the other cornerback spot, JUCO transfer Kendrick Harper (5-9, 190, Jr.) and true freshman Chris Harris (6-0, 180, Fr.) will split time. These are the players the Hokies should go after with their four senior wide receivers.

At free safety, both Darrell Stuckey (6-1, 205, So.) and Sadiq Muhammed (6-0, 200, Sr.) will play. Patrick Resby (6-0, 200, Jr.) and Justin Thornton (6-1, 195, So.) will split time at strong safety.

The Jayhawks' special teams are dangerous in some ways, and weak in other ways. Let's take a look at how they rank in the national standings.

Kicker Scott Webb (5-11, 210, Sr.) has had a solid season, going 17-of-24 with a long of 48 yards. He struggled the last time out against Missouri, going 0-of-2, which was a surprise. He has had one kick blocked this year.

Kansas has an excellent kick returner in Marcus Herford (6-1, 205, r-Jr.). Herford is averaging 30 yards per return this season, with two returns for touchdowns. He is among the top kick returners in the nation. Virginia Tech ranks 13th nationally in kickoff coverage defense, so this should be a good matchup.

The punt return hasn't been as good, ranking just 108 in the nation. Raimond Pendleton (5-11, 190, r-So.) has done a solid job. He was 14 returns for 170 yards and one touchdown, but Anthony Webb (6-0, 185, So.) has 19 returns for just 16 yards, an average of less than one yard per return. This is where we could see Aqib Talib on special teams.

Punting hasn't been particularly good for Kansas this year. Kyle Tucker has averaged just 37.5 yards per punt, and as a team the Jayhawks are 111th nationally in net punting. Virginia Tech thrives in the field position game, and this is one part of the game where they have a big edge going in.

Just because you don't know anything about Kansas doesn't mean they aren't a good team. We don't get much coverage of teams west of the Mississippi here in Virginia, so Tech fans haven't had much exposure to Kansas, with the exception of their loss to Missouri in the last game of the season. At that point the Jayhawks were #2 in the nation and in the national title picture.

This game concerns me. I think Virginia Tech is more physical than Kansas, and I think they have an overall team speed advantage. The reason this game concerns me is that Kansas has a lot more to gain on a national level than Virginia Tech by winning this game. If the Hokies win, it won't make much noise on the national level. But if Kansas upsets Virginia Tech, people will take notice.

Kansas will present some matchup problems in this game. They like to spread out the defense with four wide receivers. Tech's corners will be in man-to-man coverage at times in this game, and the Jayhawks will test the Hokie defense with their slot receivers. It will be interesting to see how Bud Foster plays this one. I've always been a fan of teams who spread the field and still use a power running game, and that's what Kansas does with Brandon McAnderson.

I think Tyrod Taylor has a chance to be very effective in this game. Down the stretch, he wasn't healthy. He obviously wasn't 100% against Boston College back on December 1. He should be 100% against Kansas. I've got a feeling his legs are going to play a major role in this one. It will be similar to Michael Vick against Florida State. Vick spent most of the 1999 season with an ankle that wasn't 100%. He recovered in the time off before the Sugar Bowl, and the FSU defense wasn't prepared for his type of speed.

I honestly believe this could be the best matchup of any of the BCS bowls from an X's and O's standpoint. It could be the closest BCS bowl as well. I'm going with the Hokies. Team speed, physical play, and a lot of senior experience will be the difference in the end.

That breakdown of the Kansas offense and defense is an interesting and impressive list of stats and players. The special teams, not so much, but in reading about Kansas, you can see how they compiled their 11-1 record. Say what you want about their schedule, but not only did they win, they did it in impressive fashion. It reminds me of the 1999 Hokies, who didn't have much in the way of competition, but what they did face, they demolished. The Jayhawks outscored the opposition 44-16 this year, compared to the 1999 Hokies advantage of 41-11.

Did that set your mind right, or are you still pooh-poohing the Jayhawks? You shouldn't. The Hokies need to come to play, or they'll find themselves where the 1995 Texas Longhorns found themselves after the Sugar Bowl: wondering what just happened.

Admit it. You're having a hard time being scared of Kansas. What if the opposition's team colors, instead of blue and red, were crimson and white, and what if the school name across the front of their jerseys said "Oklahoma" instead of "Kansas"? If that were true, wouldn’t you take that 11-1 record, that list of decorated players, and those sky-high stats more seriously? Wouldn't that stir the butterflies in the pit of your stomach?

What's in a name? Does it make the football team any better?

As Chris detailed in last Friday's TSLMail, there's a lot at stake here for the Hokies and the ACC. I personally have had a hard time getting worked up over the matchup with the Jayhawks, and based on Virginia Tech's inability to sell out their Orange Bowl ticket allotment, Hokie fans feel the same way. (There are other factors, such as a problematic Jan. 3rd game date, that are limiting ticket sales, but again, if the opponent was Oklahoma, don't you think the Tech tickets would be sold out?)

But after making that Oklahoma comparison, and thinking about what's at stake for the Hokies, I'm suddenly starting to get into this game mentally.

The Hokies are 1-3 in BCS Bowls (called Alliance Bowls in 1995 and 1996), and my personal feeling is that they should be 1-3. The 1995 Texas Longhorns weren't that great a team, in my opinion, and the Hokies were better. The 1996 Nebraska Cornhuskers and 2004 Auburn Tigers were clearly better than their Hokie counterparts, and as much as I think the Hokies should have won the 1999 Sugar Bowl, FSU was the better, more well-rounded team that year. So the 1-3 record in BCS Bowls matches the levels of the teams, I think.

But here's a situation where your gut tells you the Hokies should win, and I would hate to see Tech flub this chance. I would hate it for the program, I would hate it for Coach Beamer, and I would hate it for the decorated seniors on this team.

As good as Kansas is, I think the Hokies should come away with the victory. If the Tech defense comes to play, if they execute what will no doubt be a great game plan by Bud Foster, Kansas will be surprised by what they're facing and, despite their offensive proficiency, will find the going tough. In order for that to be true, the Hokie D must be focused, must cover well, and must tackle well.

On offense, the lack of pressure that the Jayhawk defensive line brings in the passing game is encouraging, and I think the opportunity for both Sean Glennon and Tyrod Taylor to make plays will be there. I can't say the same for the running game, led by Branden Ore, who continues to disappoint his teammates and Hokie fans with his lack of focus and intensity.

Lastly, the Hokies have a special teams advantage, particularly a field position advantage, that can be parlayed into a big plus in this matchup.

But the Hokies have to be ready to play. If they show up flat, they could find themselves down two score or even three scores early -- it has happened in more than one bowl game, like Cal falling behind Air Force 21-0 in the Armed Forces Bowl -- and then all bets are off.

Not being inside the heads of the Kansas players or the Hokie players, I'm going to assume that both teams come out ready, and both teams play a good game. This should be a back and forth contest, and I see the outcome being: